Your Design, Their Mould: Keeping Ownership in a China Build

Protection Starts Before the First Email

The most valuable version of your product is usually the one you send to a factory for quotation: the drawing that makes it buildable. That is also the moment you stop controlling it.

Buyers tend to think about protection too late, and in the wrong order - they look for it when something already feels wrong: a familiar shape in a competitor's catalogue, a mould a supplier will not release, a second factory that seems to know more than you told it. By then the cheap moves are behind you.

The sequence that works is unglamorous. Work out what you actually own: a brand name, an appearance, a mechanism, a set of drawings, the tool that makes the part. Put a document behind each of those before a workshop sees any of them. Factory selection belongs in that sequence, which is why meeting the real maker rather than the layer in front of it is worth the extra day.

None of this assumes bad faith. Most factories handle a design carefully, because repeat business is worth more than a copied part.

Register the Mark in China, Not Only at Home

A trademark you own at home does not travel with your order. Rights are territorial: the name you spent years building is only defended here if it is registered here, and registration follows the first applicant rather than the first user.

That single fact changes the timing. The useful moment to file is before the brand goes onto packaging, a shop front or a catalogue a supplier will read - not after a copy appears. Cover the classes you really trade in, which is rarely the single class a newcomer picks.

Then keep the paper close. The certificate belongs in the order file rather than a folder somewhere else, and your manufacturer should be told in writing which mark is yours. Where goods carry a logo, a registered right gives you something concrete to point at.

Filing involves classes, deadlines and renewals, and the answer changes with how the product is sold. Treat it as work for a qualified adviser rather than something to improvise from a template.

The Mould Belongs to Whoever Can Document It

Tooling is where the argument usually starts, because it is the one part of your product that is physical, costly and sitting inside somebody else's building.

The questions to settle before money is committed are narrow. Who pays for the tool? Who owns it? Where is it stored, who may use it, and on what terms can you take it away? A mould that cannot leave a factory is not really yours, whatever the invoice says.

Write those answers into the order documents rather than a message thread, and attach something that identifies the tool itself: a drawing number, a photograph, a tag. Agree how it is maintained and who absorbs the cost when it wears. Most tooling disputes are not about ownership in the abstract. They are about a buyer who cannot prove which tool is theirs.

How a factory keeps those records tells you something too. A supplier who knows where your tool lives, and can show you, tends to behave like a partner - the same checks described in what to look at inside a factory visit.

How Much of the Design You Share, and When

Protection is not one decision but a staircase. Each step down shares more of the design, and each step should be earned.

The first share is a concept: an outline, a photograph of a sample, the function you want. It is enough for a quotation and reveals little. The second is a specification: dimensions, materials, tolerances, finish. That is what a factory needs to price the work seriously. The third is the technical package: drawings, tool drawings, the bill of materials, the process notes. That is the step where a design becomes easy to reproduce.

So the order is simple. Concept, then specification, then technical package - and the last of the three only once the agreements in the next section are signed. Where you can, send a watermarked drawing rather than a native file, and keep a dated copy of everything you release.

An agreement signed at the start is worth more than a stern paragraph added afterwards, and most suppliers prefer that clarity to ambiguity.

The Paper That Gets Used, and the Limits of a Blog

Four documents do most of the work. A confidentiality agreement, signed before the technical package moves. A tooling agreement, naming the tool, its owner and the conditions for release. An exclusivity clause where you are paying for one, with a scope and term you could actually enforce. And the trademark certificate.

Two more items are cheap to keep. The specification you gave the factory, in the version you gave it, because that defines what was asked for. And the inspection or first-article report, because it records what was produced. That pair is what an independent inspection before shipment turns into evidence rather than opinion.

None of this replaces legal advice. How a clause is drafted, whether it can be enforced in a particular province, when to escalate - those are questions for a qualified adviser. What a buyer can do without help is keep the file complete and dated.

The same discipline runs through the rest of a buying week, starting with the order in which price and terms get settled. If you are building a sourcing trip around it, the China Business Travel and Trade Services hub is the place to begin, and a semi-self-guided trip is how most buyers keep the meetings and the paperwork in one file.

Frequently Asked Questions